SM-3 Block IIA Completes TDACS Preliminary Design Review

Good news for the SM-3 Block IIA; Raytheon Company has announced in a press release that the company has completed the preliminary design review (PDR) of the SM-3 Block IIA’s throttleable divert and attitude control system. This a rocket motor with four main divert nozzles and six attitude control nozzles and the TDACS’s precision propulsion will enable the SM-3 Block IIA to intercept incoming ballistic missiles with, according to Raytheon, “pinpoint accuracy.”

The canned quote reads as follows: “The TDACS is the most complex component of the SM-3 Block IIA,” said Wes Kremer, vice president of Raytheon Missile Systems’ Air and Missile Defense Systems product line. “The design detail and test data presented at the PDR demonstrated the TDACS is ready for the next phase of development.”

SM-3 (Blocks IA, IB and IIA) are a crucial part of the Missile Defense Agency’s sea-based Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System. The SM-3 Block IIA is co-developed between the U.S. and Japan as part of phase three of the U.S.’s Phased Adaptive Approach. The SM-3 Block IIA has a larger motor, and bigger, more  advanced kinetic warhead that will allow for a greater defended area, protecting both the U.S. and its allies from ballistic missiles.

The program which was due to for completion in 2016 was delayed until 2018 due to concerns about quality control of components. Japan will have six cruisers capable of deploying the interceptors in 2020 or so.

 

Taepodon Trigger#3: U.S. Knew of DPRK Plan Last Dec.

The plot thickens. As I pointed out in my original blog, all is not what it seems in the conventional media narrative about North Korean space launches and missile tests. The Yomiuri in “DPRK ‘told U.S. about plan on Dec. 15′” has just done some important work in revealing that it may well be that the United States knew as early as mid-December about this April’s North Korean satellite launch. The story reads as follows:

“WASHINGTON–A senior North Korean government official informed the United States before the death of Kim Jong Il was announced in December of its plan to launch a satellite, according to a former senior U.S. government official.
In an article for a U.S. research institute, Evans Revere, who served as acting assistant secretary of state under the administration of President George W. Bush, wrote that the decision to carry out the launch is highly likely to have been made by the late North Korean leader.
…Revere met with the North Korean official on Dec. 15 and was told about the planned launch of what some people believed to be a missile. The meeting is believed to have taken place in New York…”

This fits entirely in with standard practice by media, partly because it’s a great story, to hype the DPRK threat, (remember the original Taepodon incident of 1998 was not a shock at all, it was a trigger)  which is used by Japan’s political establishment (rightly, in my opinion) to promote further strategic investment and spending in Japan’s defense capabilities. Ultimately, and very indirectly of course, this is fed by nationalism and fear of abandonment. Those specters lurk very deep in the background. But they are there, nonetheless.

This whole prearranged dance is not what it seems at all…

….While a minor and enjoyable subroutine of my job as a researcher is to look at how politicians and the media work to manufacture opinion one of the hazards and joys is looking at the some of the dire rubbish that is fed to otherwise intelligent readers by the dregs of the media, I feel it’s important to keep some sort of sensible narrative up about important incidents such at the DPRK’s satellite launch. The whole idea about deploying PAC-3 to Okinawa to defend Japan is made-up media guff but the launch over the Yellow Sea will provide the MSDF with a valuable tracking and training opportunity, while there is no threat to Japan or its southernmost island chain at all.

For your amusement:

If you did read the CNN piece about those good ol’ Eagis ships protecting us from the commies, you would have also learned from CNN International that the North Koreans were planning “a rocket-powered satellite launch.” Or was that The Daily Telegraph?  Well hot dog!

It looks like the Taepodon Trigger #3 is fully in effect in both Japan and the ROK meanwhile.

Japan’s First Space PFI

In its March 22 editorial Security, efficiency must go together in space use the Yomiuri Shimbun writes about how the Ministry of Defense is using a PFI to procure two badly needed communications satellites instead of renting transponders from what used to be Mitsubishi’s SCC Superbird satellites before SCC was absorbed by its longstanding rival J-SAT

(Actually its a bit more complex than this because of the digital satellite broadcasting wars of the 90s and the launch and demise of DirecTV and J Sky B’s PerfecTV! .You can tell who won by the name of the company that the MOD is renting transponders off: SKY Perfect JSAT Corporation.)

The Yomuiri goes on to say: “Military technology has made remarkable progress in recent years. Even in the field of space technology, more emphasis should be placed on national security aspects. The Defense Ministry will for the first time seek to obtain two communication satellites for its exclusive use.”

The Yomiuri’s point is that instead of renting X-band transponders, by having its own satellites,  “communication among the three forces will become smoother” and …”the share of communication lines allotted to each defense force can be adjusted. It will be also possible to place satellites in the most ideal position for the SDF, thereby ensuring high-speed, large-capacity–and better quality–communication lines.”

The story behind this is the zero-sum budget that the MOD currently faces for military space use. Those familiar with Japan’s nascent military space development will know that as early as 2009 the MOD created a shopping list of items it felt it might need in terms of military space assets, but these have remained a wish-list because (a) budget for them will have to come from somewhere else within the MOD (b) conservative elements in the MOD are wedded to massive hardware procurements and the space constituency in the MOD is new and has to fight for relevancy against the people who want more DDS or more F-35s (c) the Joint Chiefs of Staff have only just really started a military space policy following last year’s 2+2.

However the main point is the budget situation at the moment, hence the PFI solution, which was originally recommended by my old friend Sakamoto san, who used to lead SJAC’s space and aerospace unit. PFI will probably used for MOD’s EW or own dedicated SERVIS-3 based spy satellites, if these programs ever “get off the ground.”

Here is the original Space News Article:

Japan Sets Next H-2A and Kounotori-3 Launches

Jaxa and MHI have just announced that they have set the launch dates for the next H-2A and Kounotori-3 (HTV-3).

H-2A flight 21 is scheduled to launch JAXA’s Global Changing Observation Mission 1st – Water  “SHIZUKU” (GCOM-W1) and the KOMPSAT-3 (Korean Multi-purpose Satellite 1)  of the Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI) May 18 (Friday), 2012 (Japan Standard Time) at  1:39 a.m. thru 1:42 a.m. (Japan Standard Time).

To capitalize on the excess launch capability of the H-IIA F21, Japan is also provide launch and orbit injection opportunities for two small secondary  payloads.

Also H-II Transfer Vehicle Kounotori-3 (HTV-3)  aboard the H-2B Launch Vehicle No. 3 is scheduled for launch on  July 21 (Saturday), 2012 (Japan Standard Time, JST) around 11:18 a.m. (JST). The launch window will run July 22 (Sunday) through August 31 (Friday), 2012 (JST) at the Yoshinobu Launch Complex at the Tanegashima Space Center.

It’s going to be a busy time for JAXA and MHI and a lot is riding on both missions.

First of all with the STS now retired, Japan is taking a vital role in resupplying ISS and both the HTV and the H-2B relatively new.

MHI and JAXA have been on a 12-year campaign to fully master the H-2 A/B technologies but the H-2B and HTV, a highly advanced automatic tug and the subject of more than 20 years of research by JAXA, are  still very early into their launch careers. Experienced space watchers know that new technologies are still on probation until their launch rates reach double figures. Of course, failure of the mission to the ISS would not only be an international disaster for Japan, but cause the ISS program many issues.

There is also a lot riding on the KOMPSAT launch, as the H-2A is carrying a major Korean research satellite. While the ROK has found out that launch systems are extremely difficult to develop, having seen its first two efforts end unhappily, a failure of a launch of a prize Korean satellite aboard a Japanese rocket could deeply impact fractious Japan-ROK relations unless handled well by both sides. No doubt vituperation (from the ROK side) and conspiracy theories will abound.

The Kunotori mission is carrying several intriguing payloads, including two reentry accuracy and measurement experiments; the REBR (Reentry Breakup Recorder) manufactured by  Aerospace Corporation, which will record data regarding the thermal, acceleration, rotational and other stresses that Kounotori will go through as it breaks up on reentry,  and the much larger (22kg) i-Ball by IHI Aerospace which will do a similar job, but also has a camera.

JAXA is planning to release Cubesats from the International Space Station using the JEM’s  robot hand, from Japan these will be  RAIKO (Wakayama University) FITSAT-1 (Fukuoka Institute of Technology) and the WE WISH radio ham cubesats and TechEdSat built by San Jose State University and the F-1 cubesat by FPT University.

Good luck, chaps.

Update 2: Taepodon Trigger #3

Update; some news has made it into some media that the Eunha-3 is going to come nowhere near Japan and it seems the press is gradually catching up to the news that the rocket’s path is due south as we see it “consistent with a satellite launch.” Of course it’s good PR to use the launch to focus attention on the need for Japan to bolster its BMD, but it seems people are slowly waking up to some basic facts about the launch.

The latest spin is “crash fears” about the “propulsion stage.” Put on your tin helmets!

The Taepodon Trigger (by which I mean magnifying external events to trigger changes in Japan’s national security stance)  is now fully in effect, with politicians and the media not wasting the opportunity drum up and repackage a good story about Japan preparing to shoot down the DPRK’s Eunha-3 (Galaxy) rocket next month to launch the Kwangmyŏngsŏng-3 if necessary.

The story, as repackaged from the Asahi in Time (Japan Threatens to Shoot Down NoKo Missile. Really) is a typical copying local reports “that Japanese Defense Minister Naoki Tanaka told Diet members Monday that “We will take the (necessary) procedures in the event of a contingency that threatens our country’s security,” and pointed out that Japan has Patriot PAC-3 and Aegis destroyers that could do the job. Japan’s Ground Self-Defense Forces began deploying Patriot batteries to Japan’s southern islands today.”

The article then goes on to copy the same old media rubric that I have to use in my media articles about the “Japanese” still being  “traumatized by a 1998 test in which nuclear-armed North Korea lobbed a ballistic missile directly over the home islands.”

“The incident prompted the Japanese to join the US in missile-defense R&D, and it remains a cornerstone of Japanese defense policy.”

This is lazy journalism, reinventing the past and not checking the facts and not knowing the basics about what is happening because:

1. The 1998 “missile test” was a space launch attempt and Japan and the U.S. were notified about it at least a month in advance and in fact an Aegis cruiser was put in the Sea of Japan to track the SLV’s flightpath

2. The original Taepodong 1 did not overfly or violate Japan’s territory.

3. Japan’s cooperation with MD did not directly result from this incident; in fact the IGS program was triggered.

Please see In Defense of Japan for more details and Taepodon Trigger #3: DPRK to attempt 3rd Satellite Shot- Third Time Lucky?

The SLV will fly over the Yellow Sea and not Japan. SM-3 is designed to intercept an IRBM in orbit. PAC-3 is not designed to shoot down IRBMs and even if the thing blew up on the way up, there is a vanishingly small chance of a hunk of metal landing on Naha. Could PAC-3 be of any use anyway? Perhaps a garbage-can chunk of debris containing a basket ball sized satellite might conceivably drop somewhere over the Yellow Sea somewhere but what has that got to do with PAC-3?

Finally all of the press (including the Yomiuri’s Govt may send PAC-3s to Okinawa / SDF readying for launch of DPRK rocket) is ignoring the fact that the movement of PAC-3 is ALREADY PLANNED.

But don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story.  Please see my Defense News article from this week below.

The point is that these and other “scares” will be used to help bolster Japan’s defense posture, which is an excellent thing overall.

SNS Features Japan’s Strategic Space Development

Here is a special edition of SNS updating my original article of 2006 predicting what was going to happen in Japan’s space development. Four years later, I turned out to be spot on. Strategic News Service provides real information based on original reporting by experts to try to bridge the chasm opening up between the familiar media tropes and cliches of the mass media and what’s actually going on. Almost none of the information in this newsletter is from “news” conferences.

The interesting thing about the introduction to my piece is the great anxiety raised by the MOD over China’s blue water fleet and aircraft carrier. Japan is planning its own SLBM program at some point if it decides to build a strategic deterrent (see Space on Demand). With news of 800 Chinese marines at one point preparing to land on the Senkakus (only warned off at the last moment by a very angry Hillary Clinton) hopefully Japan will realize the only way to stand up to a bully is to show you that you have your own knife at the ready to his club.

—-

Publisher’s Note: For several years now, we have been watching, predicting, and documenting the basic military profiles of China and Japan, but only as they have affected international trade and markets. The latest aspect of this would be the firing of a submarine-based intercontinental missile off the coast of Los Angeles on November 5th, most likely by a Chinese submarine – an event the Pentagon continues to deny publicly.

As we’ve seen the result of China’s sustained 19%+ compound annual growth rate in military spending, it has been obvious that her neighbors in the ASEAN world have become increasingly uncomfortable. The advent of a “blue water navy,” built around a new air-carrier capacity, coming soon, will only add to this unease.

At the same time, we continue to witness China’s client state, North Korea, acting with increasing belligerence and apparent lack of care. One is reminded of a small-minded bully trying to cause trouble in the schoolyard, and then running back under the protection of some larger kid as soon as things get hot.

The peace requirements of the Japanese constitution have long been a matter of debate and contention inside Japan, and the legal modifications mentioned in today’s issue by author Paul Kallender-Umezu appear to have opened the door to a conversion of defensive hardware, software, and budget into the offensive category.

As any modern military expert will tell you, space represents the high ground in coming global conflict. As you are about to discover, the Japanese have used a large number of peaceful programs, in concert, to allow a flip-the-switch space offensive capability beyond almost anyone’s current estimation.

I have no doubt that all of our members will be surprised and awakened to a new military space power they previously had underestimated. I think this issue of the SNS Asia Letter lives up to a well-earned reputation for clearly describing a major strategic issue that other media have yet to touch. If you want to understand Japan’s response to China’s military buildup, this letter provides an excellent place to start. And given the positioning of these second- and third-largest global economies, and their recent and growing skirmishes, this understanding should be required of all people doing business in Asia.

Americans didn’t take much notice when North Korea fired missiles over the country a few years ago – but the Japanese did. The results follow. – mra.

___

» Japan’s Strategic Space Development: Onward and Upward!

By Paul Kallender-Umezu [Tokyo]

Japan is rolling up its sleeves and getting to work on beefing up its military space technologies, whether it looks like it or not.

When explaining Japan’s military space program to otherwise intelligent people whose main source of information may be only reports from the mass media, I often get blank stares. “Japan? Does Japan even have a space program?” Some might remember astronaut Naoko Yamazaki performing the important scientific task of making sushi in a kimono on the International Space Station; others might remember an asteroid mission that recently brought some cosmic dust back to Earth. But overall, when people think of Asia and space, they probably think of China’s space program, because that’s where the majority of media attention is.

The recent Hayabusa[1] (“Falcon”) mission is a case in point. In a seven-year journey, Hayabusa flew over 2 billion kilometers on a revolutionary new ion-engine propulsion system, overcoming technical malfunctions to collect samples from an asteroid and bring them back to Earth. The mission, which contained many firsts, was spearheaded by half a dozen eggheads on a couple of hundred million bucks (that’s trim and tremendous in the space world). But you wouldn’t know much about that if you’d read the mainstream press, with coverage which focused more on problems and caveats rather than  successes.

So when I start talking about Japan’s military space programs, I often use the metaphor of a high-quality Japanese hocho – a type of kitchen knife – to describe what’s up with this strategic national technology program. As the NRA is fond of reminding people, it’s not the gun that kills, it’s the person pulling the trigger. The hocho may not be official issue in the SAS or Delta force, but this 10-inch-plus, finely crafted, durable and razor-sharp sushi-slasher is the weapon of choice for many a Japanese convenience-store robber. The shape and label point to a different application, but the sharp end still does the business. Similarly, Japan’s space program was explicitly meant for peaceful purposes right up to 2008.

Actually, Japan is a military space power with a huge toolkit of up-to-date and serviceable technologies that will keep it in the leading pack of space-faring nations, if and when it chooses to go nuclear, or if and when an orbital arms race kicks in. Sound outlandish? My book In Defense of Japan: From the Market to the Military in Space Policy (Stanford University Press, 2010)[2] goes into this exhaustively, but for a digest of some of the main issues, please read on.

Four years ago, in the SNS newsletter, I predicted that the militarization of Japan’s space program would kick into higher gear after 2010, once the nation’s almost childishly sentimental legislative breaks on such activities – a 1969 Diet resolution that limited Japan’s space development to peaceful purposes only – were removed.

This has indeed happened. In May 2008, Japan passed the Basic Space Bill establishing a national Space Headquarters for Space Policy [3](SHSP) in the Prime Minister’s Cabinet office to remove the longstanding ban on Japan’s military use of space assets and to promote Japan’s space industry. Most notably:

  • Article 2 “provides that space development and use shall be conducted in accordance with international treaties and other international commitments including the Outer Space Treaty, and pursuant to the spirit of the peaceful principle of the Constitution of Japan”; and
  • Article 14 requires the government to take “necessary measures to promote space development and use” that would promote both national and international security.

….and so on. Please go to the SNS site for the rest.

Text of Review of In Defense of Japan by Foreign Affairs Magazine

It’s nice that Andrew J. Nathan Class of 1919 Professor Columbia University Political Science took the time to review In Defense of Japan for the January/February 2011 edition of Foreign Affairs and even nicer when he’s got a lot of time for the book too.

We would like to say a very big thank you to Prof. Nathan.

Here is the full review:

 

Blog Review of In Defense of Japan

Veteran satellite journalist Peter J. Brown has written a nice review of In Defense of Japan on his new blog Japanese in Space.

One of the issues with In Defense of Japan is that it is not media friendly and not designed to be media friendly as we wanted to reach decision makers and analysts. Undoing misconceptions of Japan’s space program by decades of superficial coverage can’t be done by engaging the mass media as the message just does not jive, or jars with media  shibboleths. However, we are finding that people who are seriously interested in this area find the time to read In Defense of Japan through and “get” our arguments.

Peter’s take amounts to: “…this  writer is hard pressed indeed to identify any recent book in English  that comes close to covering as much ground as this one does.”

Here is an excerpt:

Many thanks Peter and keep up the good work on Japanese in Space!

Taepodon Trigger #3: Update

Here’s a twist. Our nice neighbors from the north are inviting us to go watch their new toy blast off.

As I predicted on Friday’s piece, meanwhile the Japanese are talking about blasting the thing out of space. Take a look at (JFTM-1) Stellar Kiji! Pretty cool!

Right on cue the Taepodon Trigger #3 is already working, with the J-media queuing to bait  pols with patriot tests (pun intended, sorry)  while cooking up a fair bit of hysteria over a minor satellite launch. Albeit one clearly and very properly in violation of UN Security Council resolution 1874

Here from Kyodo:
Japan Starts Mulling Plan On Intercepting N Korean Rocket

OMITAMA (Kyodo)–Defense Minister Naoki Tanaka said Saturday that his ministry has started considering whether to take preparatory measures to destroy the rocket-mounted satellite North Korea is preparing to launch next month.

You have to laugh at Kyodo. “Rocket mounted satellite.” You don’t say!

The ministry is considering whether to deploy ground-based Patriot Advanced Capability-3 interceptors and Aegis-equipped destroyers carrying Standard Missile-3 ballistic missile interceptors, Tanaka told reporters at the Air Self-Defense Force’s Hyakuri air base in Omitama, Ibaraki Prefecture.

‘We are currently doing a mental exercise to prepare (for the planned rocket launch), using the previous incident as our guide,” Tanaka said, referring to the government’s decision at the time of the launch of long-range ballistic missile by Pyongyang in April 2009.

In March 2009, Yasukazu Hamada, defense minister at the time, issued an order for the Self-Defense Forces to destroy a North Korean rocket or its debris in the event that it fell onto Japanese territory.

With the issuance of the order, the ASDF dispatched units capable of launching PAC-3 missiles to Iwate and Akita prefectures in northeastern Japan as well as the Tokyo metropolitan area, while the Maritime Self-Defense Force deployed three Aegis guided-missile destroyers in the Sea of Japan and the Pacific.

Then right on cue, here are both Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda (not Yoshiko Noda) on the telly on Asahi News doing the very normal thing of telling future MOD leaders graduating from the 防衛大学 (where I have some Karate mates-  tough geezers!) that AP defense situation is opaque and Defense Minister Naoki Tanaka telling them they’d better have their smarts on.

Expect next month’s launch to (a) be a prelude to a possible nuke test and (b) for Japan to go for strenghtened and semi-independent space-based EW at the end of the decade.

Taepodon Trigger #3: DPRK to attempt 3rd Satellite Shot- Third Time Lucky?

You couldn’t make it up. You just couldn’t. I just asked the MOD about this very likelihood this week!

The announcement that the DPRK is attempting a third satellite launch in mid-April is just the sort of development that will help propel Japan’s basic BMD and nascent military space deployment.

The fact that so the Eunha-3 (Galaxy) rocket will fly over the Yellow Sea and not Japan doesn’t mean the news hasn’t already caused a huge stir in Japan, with the story being the top news on most TV.

Regardless of the flightpath, the launch will constitute another violation of June 2009’s UNSC Resolution 1874 that was passed the last time DPRK tried to launch a satellite (see below).

“We urge North Korea to exercise restraint and refrain from the launch,” said Chief Cabinet Secretary Osamu Fujimura, echoing statements from ROK.

What timing!

On Tuesday I was talking to Masayuki Iwaike, Director of Missile Defense and Space Policy at MOD about Japan’s approach to SSA and likely speed of moves by Japan on Early Warning, following last June’s 2+2, when Japan and the U.S. basically agreed that Japan will add some form of EW capability to its BMD systems, either through adding IR sensors on QZSS/Michibiki  or through several different satellite bus plans (candidates include

SERVIS-3 by USEF and ASNARO, among others) with the CISC probably jealously guarding its independence with the IGS program, keeping it from the Space Strategy Office to be formed in April.

The key point about next week’s Defense News article, will be that Japan has more or less completed its basic two-tier BMD system, with its radar and sensor structure also on the verge of completion with the fourth and final FPS-5 S-band phased array ground based early warning radar nearly finished, joining the upgraded FPS-3 3-D phased-array radars, and JADGE up and running. Meanwhile PAC-3 is being boosted and the MSDF is adding two more SM3-Block 1A capable cruisers.

So the big question was to Iwaike, will you accelerate plans or add capability if the recent U.S.-DPRK agreement turns out to be not worth the paper its written on?

– Remember last month North Korea supposedly agreed to suspend uranium enrichment, halt nuclear and long-range missile tests, and to allow back U.N. weapons inspectors in exchange for a quarter of a million tons of “food aid.”

So what happens if they start firing off their nasty fireworks demonstrating significant new capabilities, or creditable information comes out about successful miniaturization of their Pakistani/stolen bargain-basement fission bomb technology (actually, then consequently making it a creditable threat)?

Will Japan build out BMD?

Of course, I didn’t put the it that way, but the message was an unequivocal yes. Because all the key systems are in place. But that’s for next week’s article.

Please read Defense News on Monday.

The beauty of the SM3-/PAC-3 two-tier system is that it works (with caveats, see Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress) and it’s only going to get better. And when the Chinese decided to create chaos in orbit  with its 2007 ASAT test leading to what is rapidly going to become a crisis if nothing is done over the next decade, the U.S. was able to remind the Chinese just whom they are dealing with if they are serious.

And then, just on time, news comes out that North Korea is attempting its third satellite launch (Kwangmyŏngsŏng-3) around April 12-16 to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the birth Kim Il Sung, on April 15.

The Taepodon Trigger

One of the key stories in In Defense of Japan is the story of the Taepodon Trigger, which is more commonly called the Taepodon Shock.

Whatever else it doesn’t have going for it, the DPRK is a master of timing. It’s almost as if it wants Japan to further rearm to create a foreign bugbear to rail against and rally the (starving) masses. The history of DPRK missile launches is quite intriguing. In 1998, the attempted launch of Kwangmyongsong-1 aboard a re-gigged Taepodon gave Japan the decisive inflection point it needed to launching military space development, instead of developing dual-use technology research and development programs that could be converted to military use if and when needed. This is essentially the story behind Japan’s IGS, which is a regigged Melco USERS bus with not very good radar and optical sensors (which are getting better, nearing half-meter now for Gen-2 optical at least).

At the time, I can vividly remember the shock and outrage behind the missile overfly, which was largely stage-managed by media and politicians, since (a) Japan and the U.S. knew about the launch a month in advance, having been informed by the DPRK about it, and had an Aegis missile cruiser tracking the thing (b) the satellite launch didn’t actually violate Japan’s airspace at all and (c) as was actually an attempted satellite launch, not a missile test, as made out by the Japanese media.

Now while I am a strong supporter of Japan and no fan of the DPRK, the facts are the facts. Within 10 days of the “shocking missile test,” Ichiro Taniguchi, the Lion of Melco, was briefing the Cabinet on what was to become IGS. For more on this, please read In Defense of Japan.

But it was more of the same in 2009 when the nation in April attempted the launch of Kwangmyŏngsŏng-2 aboard an Unha-2 rocket carrying the satellite, following this with two rounds of missile tests in July 2009 and then a probably partially successful nuclear test in October. A busy year for everyone, and provocation that has helped Japan to bolster its SM-3 fleet to six ships.

In a perverse sense, the latest launch looks right on schedule. In order to prop up the 3rd incarnation of the Kim Dynasty, the DPRK needed a quick win in its poker strategy diplomacy of threat, bluff, and (insincere) concession cycle. On what levels the events of the last two months are wins for the regime vary; if they get the food and launch the satellite, it will buy the new regime a lot of time perhaps. If the perfidious Yankie and, etc., imperialists “renegade”  on the deal, and the satellite is triumphantly launched (whether it will or not, it will still triumphantly succeed in glorious honor of what not, of course, right) then it still provides glue to hang the new regime together on. Oh the poor suffering people.

All this of course is grist for the mill for Japan and is, ahem, unlikely to disincentivize Japan from pushing forward with EW and better BMD.

Update: This is from Reuters: Launch called a ‘deal-breaker

US: NKorea planned rocket launch a ‘deal-breaker’

The U.S. State Department issued the following statement, March 16:

“North Korea’s announcement that it plans to conduct a missile launch in direct violation of its international obligations is highly provocative. UN Security Council Resolutions 1718 and 1874 clearly and unequivocally prohibit North Korea from conducting launches that use ballistic missile technology. Such a missile launch would pose a threat to regional security and would also be inconsistent with North Korea’s recent undertaking to refrain from long-range missile launches. We call on North Korea to adhere to its international obligations, including all relevant UN Security Council Resolutions. We are consulting closely with our international partners on next steps. U.S. now says it will not  send food aid to North Korea if it goes ahead with the long-range rocket launch, and U.N. Security Council members said it may violate sanctions.”

The DPRK argues that satellite launches are part of a peaceful space program that is exempt from international disarmament obligations, but according to Reuters, State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland said the U.S. now had “grave concerns” about the Feb. 29 agreement under which the North agreed with the U.S. to nuclear concessions and a moratorium on long-range missile tests in return for 240,000 tons of food aid.

Nuland said a rocket launch would call into question North Korea’s good faith. She said that during the negotiations for the U.S.-North Korea agreement, “we made clear unequivocally that we considered that any satellite launch would be a deal-breaker.

Expect a third nuclear test!